Ipsilandis, P G (2007) Multiobjective linear programming model for scheduling linear repetitive projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(6), pp. 417-424. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Linear repetitive construction projects require large amounts of resources which are used in a sequential manner and therefore effective resource management is very important both in terms of project cost and duration. Existing methodologies such as the critical path method and the repetitive scheduling method optimize the schedule with respect to a single factor, to achieve minimum duration or minimize resource work breaks, respectively. However real life scheduling decisions are more complicated and project managers must make decisions that address the various cost elements in a holistic way. To respond to this need, new methodologies that can be applied through the use of decision support systems should be developed. This paper introduces a multiobjective linear programming model for scheduling linear repetitive projects, which takes into consideration cost elements regarding the project's duration, the idle time of resources, and the delivery time of the project's units. The proposed model can be used to generate alternative schedules based on the relative magnitude and importance of the different cost elements. In this sense, it provides managers with the capability to consider alternative schedules besides those defined by minimum duration or maximizing work continuity of resources. The application of the model to a well known example in the literature demonstrates its use in providing explicatory analysis of the results.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computer programming; project management; scheduling |
| Index terms: | delivery time, project management, resource management, duration, project manager, repetitive project, linear programming, programming, methodology, critical path method, decision support, scheduling, repetitive scheduling, manager, project cost, repetitive construction |
| Subjects: | time analysis, project controls, decision analysis, building construction, production management, project management theory and practice, economics, algorithms, research methods, operations research, programming, control systems, practitioner, profession |
| Topics: | Time Control, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here