Lee, E B and Thomas, D K (2007) State-of-practice technologies on accelerated urban highway rehabilitation: I-15 California experience. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(2), pp. 105-113. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This case study paper presents an innovative fast-track approach applied to a heavily trafficked urban freeway reconstruction project in Southern California. Badly deteriorated truck lanes in both directions along a 4.5-km stretch of I-15 were rebuilt from the gravel base up. The operations, estimated to take 10 months using traditional nighttime closures, were completed in two 9-day continuous closures with round-the-clock (about 210 h for each direction) operations. This "Rapid Rehab" project adopted state-of-practice technologies to accelerate construction, mitigate traffic disruptions, and propagate project information. As a result, traffic demand through the construction work zone was reduced by 20% and the maximum peak-hour delay was reduced by 50%. The estimated benefits of accelerated reconstruction on this project included a 28% reduction in agency cost and 29% time value savings to road users, compared to the traditional approach of using repeated nighttime closures. Web surveys showed dramatic changes in public perception of the Rapid Rehab approach from initial reluctance and objection to positive support.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concrete pavements; fast track construction; highway construction; project management; public opinion; reconstruction |
| Index terms: | construction work, highway construction, project management, case study, reconstruction, savings, agency, survey |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, operations management, economic analysis, civil engineering, project management theory and practice, sociology, building construction |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here