Luo, Y Z; Shen, Y B and Xu, X (2007) Construction method for cylindrical latticed shells based on expandable mechanisms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(11), pp. 912-915. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This note proposes a cost-effective construction method for large span cylindrical latticed shell structures. The method converts a latticed shell into a six-bar linkage, allowing the major part of the assembling work to be carried out at ground level. The structure is then lifted into position by activation of the predetermined mechanism mode and the structure is completed by adding additional members. In the note, we present the detailed construction procedures, together with some technical challenges that were encountered in practice. A discussion of the possible solutions to these challenges is also given, together with some suggestions for future similar applications of the method. From this study, researchers may borrow ideas to explore new construction methods, and practitioners of this technology can apply it more safely and properly.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | coal storage; construction methods; cylindrical shells; lifting |
| Index terms: | construction method, linkage, practitioner, lifting |
| Subjects: | building construction, occupational health and safety management, practitioner, business |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Site Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here