Tradesmen involvement in health and safety

Maloney, W F; Cameron, I and Hare, B (2007) Tradesmen involvement in health and safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(4), pp. 297-305. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Craftsmen performing construction work are in the best position to determine how a job should be performed safely. They should be involved in planning the safe execution of the work. Involvement will be a function of opportunity, capability, and motivation. A survey of contractor management personnel and craftsmen was conducted to assess their perceptions of these variables. A simulated planning exercise was conducted to assess craftsmen's capabilities, in terms of knowledge, of construction tasks and risks. Craftsmen were found to be capable, but inexperienced in reducing their knowledge to writing. Questioning uncovered the depth of their knowledge. Craftsmen perceive themselves as capable and motivated and seek the opportunity to be involved in planning for health and safety.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: occupational health; risk management; safety
Index terms: risk management, construction work, craft worker, exercise, personnel, health and safety, motivation, occupational health, survey
Subjects: health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, data collection methods, risk assessment, psychology, operations management, health safety and environment, management, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here