Decision making in flexible mine production system design using real options

Mayer, Z and Kazakidis, V (2007) Decision making in flexible mine production system design using real options. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(2), pp. 169-180. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Large multifaceted capital projects, such as those in the mineral resource industry, are often associated with diverse sources of both internal and external risks and uncertainties. Risks can cause delays to the planned schedule of a project, add a significant cost, and greatly influence its profitability. Uncertainties can be associated with project risks, as well as with opportunities that can develop throughout the project's lifecycle. Having the ability to plan for these uncertainties, by incorporating flexible alternatives into the system design, is increasingly recognized as critical to long-term corporate success. This paper advances the knowledge needed to incorporate flexibility in systems engineering and management for both practitioners and researchers. Flexibility is defined in this paper as the ability of a system to sustain performance, preserve a particular cost structure, adapt to internal or external changes in operating conditions, or take advantage of new opportunities that develop during a mine's life cycle by modifying operational parameters. By engaging in planning for flexible production systems, the effects of risk on a particular project value can be examined, project volatility can be calculated, and potential flexible mining alternatives can be evaluated. Once identified, a real options valuation provides a strategic decision-making tool for mine planners to determine the value of incorporating flexible alternatives into the mine plan. This paper demonstrates that flexibility can become an equal partner among the parameters controlling the decision-making process for underground engineering construction systems, followed by industry practitioners. It presents a methodology in mine production system design by introducing flexibility into design through the application of real options valuation techniques. Real world case studies related to flexible planning and design of construction and production systems in underground hard rock mines are presented.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; decision making; mining; Monte Carlo method; simulation models; system analysis; underground construction
Index terms: production system, construction system, methodology, decision-making, practitioner, life cycle, decision-making process, systems engineering, case study, real option, underground construction, capital project, mining, planner, lifecycle, underground engineering, profitability
Subjects: strategic project management, project delivery, economic analysis, practitioner, value management, data collection methods, profession, systems engineering, building construction, geotechnical engineering, decision analysis, manufacturing engineering, research methods, civil engineering
Topics: Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here