Moussourakis, J and Haksever, C (2007) Models for accurate computation of earliest and latest start times and optimal compression in project networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(8), pp. 600-608. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Operations research techniques, especially linear and integer programming, have been suggested for use in project management. Most frequently these techniques are applied to finding critical path(s) in project networks and for compressing activities for an early project completion. The simplest of these models are usually found in introductory operations research/management science textbooks and they often suffer from a common deficiency: when they employ earliest start times (ES) as variables in the model, ES of activities that are not on the critical path may be computed incorrectly. This may lead to inefficient resource reallocation and leveling. Furthermore, activities outside the critical path may be compressed unnecessarily, as will be demonstrated in this paper. We present a zero-one mixed integer programming model to correctly compute earliest and latest start times of all activities and determine the optimal compression schedule. Several extensions to the model are offered to provide different perspectives of the project and enable a project manager to answer "what if" type questions. A small example is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the models.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computation; critical path method; project management |
| Index terms: | project manager, effectiveness, project management, integer programming, mixed integer, compression, project network, critical path, management science, computation, programming, operations research, critical path method |
| Subjects: | material properties and characteristics, project management theory and practice, management, performance management, algorithms, project planning, operations research, programming, design methods, profession, computational methods, mathematical modelling |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here