Lean management model for construction of high-rise apartment buildings

Sacks, R and Goldin, M (2007) Lean management model for construction of high-rise apartment buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(5), pp. 374-384. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Execution of the finishing works in high-rise apartment buildings is made complex by the need to customize apartments to the varying requirements and designs of individual clients. The conventional construction planning practice of progressing upward from floor to floor breaks down in the face of the arbitrary sequence in which clients finalize their decisions. The results are long cycle times for delivery of completed apartments and corollary high levels of work in progress, budget and schedule overruns, and general dissatisfaction with the process on the part of the developer, contractor, subcontractors, and the clients. Application of lean construction principles to this problem has led to development of a management model that adopts pull scheduling, reduced batch sizes, and a degree of multiskilling. The main benefits expected are an enhanced ability to provide customized apartments, improved cash flow, and reduced apartment delivery cycle times. The model was first formulated in theory, then tested using a management simulation game and computer simulation, and subsequently, developed for practical application. This paper presents an analysis of conventional practice, the theoretical background to the lean approach, and the specific management changes proposed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; buildings; high-rise; lean construction; production management; residential; scheduling
Index terms: lean construction, cash flow, scheduling, production management, apartment building, face, computer simulation, subcontractor, schedule overrun, construction planning
Subjects: construction planning, project delivery, modelling and simulation, operations research, psychology, practitioner, construction type, building construction, project controls, financial management
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here