Salem, O; Shahin, A and Khalifa, Y (2007) Minimizing cutting wastes of reinforcement steel bars using genetic algorithms and integer programming models. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(12), pp. 982-992. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Materials that are in the form of one-dimensional stocks such as steel rebars, structural steel sections, and dimensional lumber generate a major fraction of the generated construction waste. Cutting one-dimensional stocks to suit the construction project requirements result in trim or cutting losses, which is the major cause of the one-dimensional construction waste. The optimization problem of minimizing the trim losses is known as the cutting stock problem (CSP). In this paper, three approaches for solving the one-dimensional cutting stock problem are presented. A genetic algorithm (GA) model, a linear programming (LP) model, and an integer programming (IP) model were developed to solve the one-dimensional CSP. Three real life case studies from a steel workshop have been studied. The generated cutting schedules using the GA, LP, and IP approaches are presented and compared to the actual workshop's cutting schedules. The comparison shows a high potential of savings that could be achieved using such techniques. Additionally, a user friendly Visual Basic computer program that utilizes genetic algorithms for solving the one-dimensional CSP is presented.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | algorithms; bars; optimization; steel; structure reinforcement |
| Index terms: | reinforcement, integer programming, savings, genetic algorithm, construction waste, rebar, case study, computer program, linear programming, construction project, workshop |
| Subjects: | software systems, waste management, data collection methods, construction type, economic analysis, production management, building materials, algorithms |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here