Economic evaluation of reinforced concrete structures with columns reinforced with prefabricated cage system

Shamsai, M; Whitlatch, E and Sezen, H (2007) Economic evaluation of reinforced concrete structures with columns reinforced with prefabricated cage system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(11), pp. 864-870. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

A new reinforcement system termed the prefabricated cage system (PCS) that can be used as an alternative to the rebar reinforcement cage is economically evaluated. PCS is a prefabricated reinforcement that enables easier, faster, and more reliable construction. Use of PCS shortens the construction schedule time and lowers total construction cost. This is important to both owners and construction contractors. The engineering economics methods presented in this paper would also be of interest to researchers. Reinforced concrete structures with PCS reinforced columns have been considered in this research, as it is one of the major applications of PCS. Various parameters affecting the economics of PCS are reviewed and a case study structure is analyzed comparing the costs of the structure with rebar reinforced columns to costs of the structure with PCS reinforced columns. The investigation shows that using PCS results in a 33.3% time savings and a 7.1% cost savings over rebar for each column. This results in an average of 3.6% savings on total project cost; an average of 22.2% savings on total column costs; 20.4% savings on total project time period, and 33.3% savings on columns construction time period. The cost savings are estimated based on production of small quantities of PCS reinforcement. Mass production of PCS reinforcement would result in even higher cost savings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concrete columns; concrete structures; concrete; reinforced; cost analysis; economic factors; efficiency; reinforcement
Index terms: construction contractor, efficiency, owner, case study, rebar, investigation, cost saving, time saving, reinforced concrete, economic evaluation, construction time, concrete structure, engineering economics, cost analysis, economic factor, savings, column, project cost, construction cost, reinforcement
Subjects: economic analysis, time analysis, economic concepts, financial and cost management, financial analysis, building materials, structural engineering, sociology, performance management, project controls, data collection methods, economics, practitioner
Topics: Construction Materials, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here