Shapira, A and Goldenberg, M (2007) "Soft" considerations in equipment selection for building construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(10), pp. 749-760. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper raises the issue of "soft" considerations in the selection of equipment for building construction projects. The paper aims at increasing the awareness: (1) to the nature, variety, and richness of soft factors; (2) to their significant role and potential impact on the outcome of decision making; and (3) to the inherent difficulty of evaluating them and integrating them within a comprehensive selection process. Existing state-of-the-art equipment selection models were analyzed and found to be inadequate in terms of both considering soft factors and providing mechanisms for their systematic evaluation. Six cases of large-size, complex construction projects were investigated to obtain an extensive list of typical soft factors. This investigation revealed that the consideration of soft factors in current practices is essentially unstructured and is not integrated within the selection process in a systematic manner. A desirable selection process is outlined that generally responds to the needs identified in the study. The proposition of a specific method for the quantitative treatment of soft factors and their tradeoff with cost factors is the subject of another paper.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction equipment; cranes; decision making |
| Index terms: | investigation, cost factor, construction project, equipment selection, construction equipment, decision-making, state of the art, building construction, tradeoff |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, building construction, economics, data collection methods, procurement capability, construction equipment, research dissemination and communication, production management |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Research Practice, Supply Chain Management, Project Management, Construction Technology, Plant and Equipment, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here