Hunter, K and Kelly, J (2003) An investigation of commonality of issues at different project stages using a three-stage project model. In: Greenwood, D J (ed.) Proceedings of 19th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2003, Brighton, UK.
Abstract
A requirement for a deeper understanding of the construction project as a concept has resulted in a study of project issues at various stages using a 'Three-Stage' project model derived from the literature on projects. The paper presents current research to determine whether similar generic issues occur at similar project stages, and therefore are predictable in nature and apply equally to construction, manufacturing or service-related projects. The study uses case study data processed by the 'Three-Stage' model to determine generalizations of recurring issues and allocates these issues to their appropriate project stages. Case study data is in the form of value management workshop reports which are auditable documents outlining the proceedings of workshops for a variety of projects at differing stages in their evolution. Research work has found that similar issues are recurring regardless of project type and therefore the application of value management would enhance the value of any project irrespective of type.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case studies; grounded theory; projects; project models; workshops |
| Index terms: | documents, evolution, case study, value management, investigation, workshop, construction project, grounded theory |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, environmental science, construction type, theoretical framing, production management, professional development, management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Value Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here