Sturts Dossick, C and Schunk, T K (2007) Subcontractor schedule control method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(3), pp. 262-265. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Trade coordination and claims documentation is a challenge on any project, particularly for specialty subcontractors. The writers introduce a schedule control method initiated by the subcontractor, which facilitates coordination and communication between a subcontractor and other project participants as well as documentation to the prime contractor. A case study illustrates the preparation of a trade-specific critical path method (CPM) schedule, which is updated on a regular basis. The writers also address the interrelationship between the CPM schedule, internal reporting, schedule of values, and labor tracking. It is difficult to ensure that all subcontractor-produced documentation is complementary, but it is well worth the effort when it comes to supporting a claim. Monthly schedule updates and narratives communicate the conflicts, issues, and schedule constraints the subcontractor experiences or anticipates on a project, thereby providing contractually required notice to the prime contractor during the project. This increases the likelihood of resolving issues during the project, while simultaneously protecting a subcontractor's position if change order requests are denied or if back charges are levied prompting a subcontractor to enforce its rights, execute a claim, or proceed to litigation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | control methods; documentation; project management; scheduling; subcontractors |
| Index terms: | change order, litigation, control method, case study, coordination, project management, documentation, scheduling, critical path method, subcontractor, narrative, schedule control |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, practitioner, dispute resolution, operations research, management, project management theory and practice, professional development, contractual condition, qualitative and interpretive research, monitoring and control, project controls |
| Topics: | Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Organizational Design, Time Control, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here