Tran, V and Tookey, J (2011) Labour productivity in the New Zealand construction industry: A thorough investigation. Construction Economics and Building, 11(1), pp. 41-60. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Productivity growth is strongly correlated to economic growth and increases in welfare. This fact also holds true at the industry level and is particularly true in the NZ construction industry, since productivity growth in this sector may have significant effects on the affordability of housing in the country. In recent years construction in NZ has been subjected to a series of reports that have either highlighted "failure" to improve productivity or have exhorted the industry to improve its "poor performance". However thus far little by way of analysis has gone into the productivity figures that have been quoted, nor has much been done to explain and justify if or why these figures are correct or incorrect. This research seeks to deconstruct construction productivity figures in NZ and explain the patterns over recent years of "poor performance" in comparison with other industries. I will examine the nature of the NZ construction industry and analyse the historic statistics related to its labour productivity. This will provide an overall understanding of the sector as well as those extraneous factors that may have significant influences on the NZ construction sector. The research found that while factors influencing inputs of labour productivity measure such as labour and material costs remained stable, factors impacting the corresponding outputs such as house and land prices, value of work in Non-residential and Infrastructure construction grew significantly between 1997 and 2007. Given the positive skewing effect of standard economic indicators (inflation etc) on construction labour productivity figures, the relatively poor performance of construction is worrying for the industry. The paper concludes by demonstrating labour productivity in construction is significantly worse performing than previously suspected.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; deconstruction; industry performance; labour productivity |
| Index terms: | industry performance, productivity, inflation, labour productivity, construction sector, housing, economic growth, investigation, affordability, economic indicator, land, construction productivity, construction industry, construction labour, New Zealand, statistics, infrastructure construction |
| Subjects: | civil engineering, economic development, management, real estate economics, Geography, financial analysis, economic analysis, operations management, construction type, mathematical modelling, data analysis and analytics, industry analysis, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Site Management, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here