Wong, P S P; Cheung, S O and Hardcastle, C (2007) Embodying learning effect in performance prediction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(6), pp. 474-482. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Predicting performance of contractors is of interest to both academics and practitioners. The physical execution of a project is critical to the overall success of the development. Having a competent contractor that can deliver is most desirable. In this aspect, a significant number of performance prediction models have been developed. Multiple regression and neural networks are typically used as the analytical tools in these prediction models. This paper reports a study that employs a learning curve approach to perform the prediction task. It is suggested that this approach can accommodate the changes in performance as experience accumulates. Thus a performance pattern is projected in addition to the project final outcome. A two-step approach suggested by Everett and Farghal was adopted for this study. First, the learning curve model that best represents a contractors' performance was explored using the least-square curve fitting analysis. Second, prediction analysis was performed by comparing the actual performance data with their respective prediction results obtained from extrapolation on the selected learning curve. The three-parameter hyperbolic model was found to provide the most reliable prediction on performance in this study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | engineering education; neural networks; parameters; performance characteristics; predictions |
| Index terms: | performance prediction, engineering education, multiple-regression, practitioner, neural network, prediction model |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, professional education, performance management, practitioner, prediction and forecasting, artificial intelligence |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here