Causes of delay in building construction projects in Egypt

Abd El-Razek, M E; Bassioni, H A and Mobarak, A M (2008) Causes of delay in building construction projects in Egypt. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(11), pp. 831-841. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Delay in construction projects is considered one of the most common problems causing a multitude of negative effects on the project and its participating parties. This paper aims to identify the main causes of delay in construction projects in Egypt from the point of view of contractors, consultants, and owners. A literature review was conducted to compile a list of delay causes that was purged based on appropriateness to Egypt in seven semistructured interviews. The resulting list of delay causes was subjected to a questionnaire survey for quantitative confirmation and identification of the most important causes of delay. The overall results indicated that the most important causes are: financing by contractor during construction, delays in contractor's payment by owner, design changes by owner or his agent during construction, partial payments during construction, and nonutilization of professional construction/contractual management. The contractor and owner were found to have opposing views, mostly blaming one another for delays, while the consultant was seen as having a more intermediate view. Results' analyses suggest that in order to significantly reduce delay a joint effort based on teamwork is required. Furthermore, causes of project delay were discussed based on the type and size of the project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; delay time; Egypt
Index terms: Egypt, causes of delay, owner, teamwork, agent, project delay, financing, construction project, questionnaire, building construction, literature review, design change, survey, interview
Subjects: building construction, sociology, project controls, management, production management, Geography, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, practitioner
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Technology, Time Control, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here