Best-value model based on project specific characteristics

Abdelrahman, M; Zayed, T and Elyamany, A (2008) Best-value model based on project specific characteristics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(3), pp. 179-188. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Best-value becomes a well known procurement practice in many states in the country. The objective of this transformation from the old practice of lowest bid to best-value is to increase the value added to the project for each dollar added. This paper discusses a new concept of best-value modeling that is unique and tailored to each project. The model uses records of past projects to obtain specific evaluation criteria, from which a best-value score is determined for each contractor. Primary parameters that impact contractor selection are identified and analyzed based on which best-value model is designed. Data are collected from groups of experts in the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Two application methods are used to assess the best-value: (1) the weighted average method; and (2) the analytic hierarchy process. Although the paper is written to assist government agencies in selecting the best contractor(s), the research results shared in this paper are relevant to both academics and practitioners. The paper provides practitioners with a tool for ranking contractors based on best-value and provides academics with selection parameters, a model to evaluate this best-value, and a methodology of quantifying the qualitative effect of subjective factors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bids; contractors; highway construction; parameters; project management
Index terms: methodology, practitioner, government agency, modelling, project management, highway construction, transformation, contractor selection
Subjects: analytical methods, business, practitioner, administrative law, tendering, civil engineering, research methods, project management theory and practice
Topics: Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here