Materials handling system simulation in precast viaduct construction: Modeling, analysis, and implementation

Chan, W H and Lu, M (2008) Materials handling system simulation in precast viaduct construction: Modeling, analysis, and implementation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(4), pp. 300-310. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The interactive, complicated system environment of a construction site renders conventional site layout planning and scheduling techniques to be inadequate in coping with materials handling system design in construction. In this paper, we present a university-industry joint endeavor for improving the effectiveness of the materials handling system on a precast viaduct construction project in Hong Kong by implementing the simplified discrete-event simulation approach (SDESA) along with its computer platform resulting from recent research. How to apply the simulation methodology of SDESA is elaborated step by step. Particular emphasis is placed on procedures of establishing a simulation model, validation of the simulation model, design of simulation experiments, and analysis of simulation results. With process flowchart, site layout plan, and process animation produced in a view-centric simulation environment, it is straightforward to establish, validate, and communicate the operations simulation. The research team convinced the project director, as well as field managers, of the functionality and effectiveness of operations simulation. The knowledge derived from simulation added to experiences of site managers in materials handling system design. With the aid of simulation, even junior engineers would be capable and confident to draw up an actionable construction plan that would lead to enhancement of cost effectiveness and productivity in the field.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bridge construction; bridges; viaduct; computer aided simulation; inventories; logistics; simulation models
Index terms: site layout planning, implementation, computer aided simulation, modelling, effectiveness, site manager, coping, productivity, engineer, simulation experiment, platform, Hong Kong, inventory, bridge construction, validation, methodology, construction project, functionality, construction site, scheduling, site layout, manager, cost-effectivenes
Subjects: design features, operations research, modelling and simulation, work location, contractual arrangements, site logistics, construction planning, analytical methods, profession, practitioner, behavioral psychology, management, performance management, economics, research methods, inventory management, Geography, production management, infrastructure engineering, digital design, professional development
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Time Control, Site Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here