Chen, Q; Reichard, G and Beliveau, Y (2008) Multiperspective approach to exploring comprehensive cause factors for interface issues. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(6), pp. 432-441. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The severity of interface issues and the necessity of interface management (IM) have not received adequate recognition from both industry and academia. The understanding of interface issues is still insufficient and the proposed or employed measures are unilateral, which result in unsatisfactory IM performance in construction projects. After establishing IM's importance in the construction industry, this paper presents a multiperspective approach that systematically explores comprehensive cause factors for various interface issues. From six interrelated perspectives, namely people/participants, methods/processes, resources, documentation, project management, and environment, hierarchical cause factors are identified and presented in a structured way. These cause factors are further converted into a series of interface management and control elements that allow for the development of an object data model and a systematic model-based IM strategy dealing with all interface issues. The multiperspective approach outperforms other research methods that analyze selected interface issues in a loose and isolated way. The findings contribute a holistic view of what causes interface issues as well as provide a solid theoretical basis for practitioners and researchers to seek all-around IM solutions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractors; interfaces; project management |
| Index terms: | documentation, strategy, practitioner, interface management, data model, construction project, interface issue, academia, project management, construction industry |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, systems engineering, educational institutions, production management, project management theory and practice, professional development, management, data science, practitioner, business |
| Topics: | Education, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here