Gkritza, K and Labi, S (2008) Estimating cost discrepancies in highway contracts: Multistep econometric approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(12), pp. 953-962. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper investigates the likelihood of occurrence and quantifies the magnitude and rate of discrepancies in highway project final costs with respect to their contract award amounts. Using data from Indiana, we develop a multistep econometric approach that can be used to estimate the effects of factors associated with the contract bidding process, project type, and the project physical environment on cost discrepancies in highway contracts. Estimation findings indicate that for a given project type and project year, contracts of larger size or longer duration are generally more likely to incur cost overruns. In addition, for contracts that incur cost overruns, the cost overrun rate decreases nonlinearly with increasing contract size up to a certain point after which the cost overrun rate increases with increasing contract size. Our approach allows for the possibility that cost overrun amounts are not linearly related to contract award amounts (contract size), and shows that greater analytical flexibility needs to be incorporated into any investigation of contract cost overruns. Agencies interested in improving their financial forecasts can replicate our proposed methodology using local contract data.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bids; costs; economic factors; estimation; financial management; highway and road construction |
| Index terms: | financial management, estimation, cost overrun, investigation, road construction, highway construction, econometric, duration, economic factor, estimate, methodology, bidding, estimating, agency |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, financial and cost management, bidding, data collection methods, sociology, project controls, economic concepts, civil engineering, research methods |
| Topics: | Time Control, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here