Hartmann, T; Gao, J and Fischer, M (2008) Areas of application for 3D and 4D models on construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(10), pp. 776-785. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In recent years more and more construction projects used three-dimensional/four-dimensional (3D/4D) models to support management tasks. However, project managers still struggle with evaluating how the 3D/4D model technology can be most efficiently applied on their specific project. One main reason for this struggle is that an account about how 3D/4D models have been used in the past is missing. This paper offers practitioners and researchers such an account of the application areas of 3D/4D model technologies including the purposes for which these technologies have been applied. The paper qualitatively aggregates the results of 26 case studies of 3D/4D model applications on construction projects to show researchers and practitioners how 3D/4D models have been applied to address project challenges. Using a "project challenge-3D/4D model application" matrix the paper explains each application area and describes why the application has been beneficial to the case study projects. The paper then analyzes the challenges that practitioners have faced with 3D/4D models on the test case projects. The main findings of this analysis are that practitioners on most of the test case projects have used the models for only one application area. The paper suggests that further research on the integration of 3D/4D model technologies into work and business processes of project teams is needed to address this opportunity for a more widespread use of 3D/4D models throughout the lifecycle of a project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computer aided design; computer aided operations; decision making; technology assessment; three-dimensional models |
| Index terms: | integration, lifecycle, computer aided design, test case, construction project, decision-making, project manager, project team, practitioner, case study, technology assessment, aggregate |
| Subjects: | computational design, practitioner, innovation and technology management, decision analysis, data collection methods, project delivery, organizational analysis, production management, profession, professional practice, materials science |
| Topics: | Project Management, Organizational Design, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here