Hassan, M M and Gruber, S (2008) Simulation of concrete paving operations on Interstate-74. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(1), pp. 2-9. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The objective of this paper was to study and optimize the concrete paving operations taking place in the reconstruction project of Interstate-74 using computer simulation. To achieve this objective, field data were collected during construction, and were then used to determine adequate probabilistic density functions for the activities' duration and to test a developed simulation model. Upon testing, the developed model was used to study the impacts of resources on the flow of operations and on the cost effectiveness of the construction process. In general, application of simulation methods to concrete paving operations was successful and its accuracy was acceptable as compared to field measurements. Based on the results of a sensitivity analysis of the critical resources, multiple factors were considered in the decision-making process to ensure that all aspects of the operation are evaluated. This includes total operation time, productivity, costs of the operation, average truck delay, and idle times for the paver and the spreader. For the conditions pertinent to this construction site, ten trucks, one paver and one spreader, and three finishing and plastic-covering crews are recommended. Using this set of resources would result in a prompt and effective execution of the operation. Practical implementation and limitations of the developed model in similar construction operations is discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concrete pavements; concrete; reinforced; highway construction; simulation |
| Index terms: | paving, reconstruction, duration, field-measurement, cost-effectivenes, construction process, density, testing, sensitivity analysis, construction site, implementation, productivity, decision-making process, computer simulation, highway construction, plastic, accuracy, construction operation |
| Subjects: | work location, building construction, modelling and simulation, data collection methods, professional practice, environmental hazards, management, project controls, analytical methods, transportation engineering, construction operations, professional development, economics, contractual arrangements, civil engineering, materials science, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Information Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Cost Management, Site Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here