Analysis of techniques leading to radical reduction in project cycle time

Hastak, M; Gokhale, S; Goyani, K; Hong, T and Safi, B (2008) Analysis of techniques leading to radical reduction in project cycle time. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(12), pp. 915-927. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Today's construction business relies on first-to-market product strategies to gain competitive advantages and increase profit margins. This has created an increased demand for a high performance capital project delivery system that can achieve a dramatic reduction in project cycle time. Very few decision tools and guidelines exist to assist owners in choosing appropriate delivery systems and project strategies to radically reduce the project cycle time from the preplanning stage through start up. The research presented in this paper surveyed the construction owners and architectural/engineering/construction firms to identify projects that have achieved greater than 25% reduction in overall project cycle time when compared to current industry standards. The data collected were analyzed to determine the techniques that facilitate radical reduction in project cycle time. These techniques include, best practices and schedule reduction techniques as well as the various management techniques employed on the projects identified by the Construction Industry Institute (CII). This research also identified the barriers to radical schedule reduction. The research concludes that radical schedule reduction well in excess of 25% can be achieved through the selective employment of management techniques, schedule reduction techniques and CII best practices. Almost every construction manager can utilize this research to improve project performance whether for radical reduction or simply more effective execution.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: best management practice; productivity; scheduling; time factor
Index terms: competitive advantage, employment, scheduling, project strategy, owner, construction firm, best practice, capital project, productivity, Construction Industry Institute, profit, project performance, construction manager, management practice, strategy
Subjects: strategic project management, organization, economic analysis, market analysis, management, sociology, business, operations research, research organizations, project management theory and practice, profession
Topics: Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here