Feasibility study of an automated tool for identifying the implications of changes in construction projects

Isaac, S and Navon, R (2008) Feasibility study of an automated tool for identifying the implications of changes in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(2), pp. 139-145. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Because of the fragmented nature of project information, decisions on changes in construction projects are usually based on project design instead of project requirements. This research proposes a new approach for coping with changes in construction projects: A change control tool (CCT) that will identify implications of a change as soon as it is proposed. The tool will ensure that the stakeholders involved in the decision process in which change proposals are evaluated will know in advance if a change could cause the project to stray from its original goals, as expressed in the requirements. The proposed CCT uses the building program as a link between client requirements and the building design and traces the different relationships that exist between the requirements in the project. The relationships are traced using requirement traceability capabilities on the level of a specific space in the project and on the level of the entire project. A preliminary CCT model was developed and pilot studies implementing the model have been conducted. The pilot studies have given positive results, indicating that the CCT could identify the scope of the proposed changes' implications.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: automation; control systems; feedback control
Index terms: traceability, program, automation, proposal, feasibility study, project design, construction project, client requirements, control system, building design, coping, change control, decision process
Subjects: control systems, architectural design, contractual arrangements, monitoring and control, professional development, production management, project planning, decision analysis, supplier oversight, design stages, automation and robotics, behavioral psychology, software systems
Topics: Research Practice, Procurement, Project Management, Digital Applications, Information Management, Supply Chain Management, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here