Best practices for integrating the concurrent engineering environment into multipartner project management

Karlsson, M; Lakka, A; Sulankivi, K; Hanna, A S and Thompson, B P (2008) Best practices for integrating the concurrent engineering environment into multipartner project management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(4), pp. 289-299. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The use of the Internet, e-mail, and other technologies has been steadily filtering into the building process, creating a concurrent engineering (CE) environment, and enabling collaborative efforts in the building process. The concurrent engineering environment is established by a variety of tools, including internet accessible servers, e-mail, mobile telephones, and many other existing CE tools. Organizations involved in the construction process recognize the need for assessment of benefits resulting from CE tools, but find the evaluation of these benefits difficult and complicated. The project presented in this paper, "project management and organization in the concurrent engineering environment (ProCE)," is applicable to both researchers and practitioners. The ProCE project developed a measuring model, which may be used by future researchers in this area, attempted to measure benefits derived from using the CE environment in construction design and project management routines, and developed guidelines for best practice implementation by practitioners, based on four case studies. The project included the measurement of both the quantitative and qualitative benefit of CE environment implementation in building construction projects using tools that were readily available through application service providers. Measurement of cost and other quantifiable benefits have been extensively studied. Therefore, the majority of the discussion in the current paper will address the ProCE project's measurement of qualitative benefits.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: benefit cost ratios; information technology; project management
Index terms: construction process, practitioner, case study, building construction, routine, internet, project management, e-mail, information technology, implementation, best practice, concurrent engineering, building process
Subjects: computing systems, engineering methods, building construction, sociology, practitioner, business, data collection methods, communication, contractual arrangements, project management theory and practice
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Information Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here