Ling, F Y Y; Low, S P; Wang, S and Egbelakin, T (2008) Models for predicting project performance in China using project management practices adopted by foreign AEC firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(12), pp. 983-990. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
China is a new market to many international architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) firms and it is not known what would be the likely project outcomes, based on different project management (PM) practices adopted. This research developed and tested five models to predict the likely project success levels, based on PM practices adopted by foreign AEC firms in China. Based on data obtained from 33 projects, multiple linear regression (MLR) models for predicting the performance of foreign managed projects in China were constructed. The models were tested against 13 new cases, and the results show that they are able to predict project outcomes with some level of accuracy. The models show that certain scope management practices can be used to predict owner satisfaction, profit margin, and cost and quality performance of the project. Construction industry practitioners who are managing projects in China may benefit from the findings by focusing more on upstream management, like managing project scope, in order to ensure project success. It is recommended that construction industry practitioners use the MLR models to make preliminary assessment of the possibility of project success based on the type of PM practices they intend to adopt in China. From the results, they can then decide if they should change their practices or abort the project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; foreign projects; international commissions; models; performance characteristics |
| Index terms: | project performance, quality performance, project scope, project management, construction industry, project success, satisfaction, project outcome, owner, practitioner, management practice, China, project management practice, accuracy, profit |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, project delivery, project completion, practitioner, scope management, sociology, industry analysis, management, Geography, project management theory and practice, professional development |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here