Liou, F M and Huang, C P (2008) Automated approach to negotiations of BOT contracts with the consideration of project risk. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(1), pp. 18-24. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The terms of concession including tariff and concession period are often discussed intensively during negotiations of build-operate-transfer (BOT) contracts. Based on prior studies on negotiation terms and risk of BOT contracts, this paper incorporates risk attributes of the BOT project into the formulation of a contractual-negotiation model. The proposed model allows the government and the sponsor to reach a consensus on the terms should the financial return as well as the risk of the project be determined. The pro forma cash flow of a BOT project is developed and used to generate the probability distribution of net present values (NPV) from the owner's viewpoint by using Monte Carlo simulation. High- and low-risk scenarios are obtained to determine whether the contractual-negotiation models vary in accordance with risk levels. Results show that, given the expected NPV, the sponsor should be offered more favorable concessional terms for projects with high risk than that with low risk. We suggest that the government and industry practitioners embody the risk attributes of the project in the automated contractual-negotiation model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; build/operate/transfer; contracts; Monte Carlo method; project management; regression models |
| Index terms: | automation, negotiation, project management, build-operate-transfer, owner, Monte Carlo simulation, probability distribution, net present value, regression model, concession period, practitioner, cash flow |
| Subjects: | practitioner, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, modelling and simulation, automation and robotics, project management theory and practice, financial management, contract structure, statistical analysis, conflict resolution, sociology |
| Topics: | Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here