Critical success factors for competitiveness of contractors: China study

Lu, W; Shen, L and Yam, M C H (2008) Critical success factors for competitiveness of contractors: China study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(12), pp. 972-982. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Gaining or maintaining a "contractor's" competitive advantage is not easy as it is determined by a large number of factors. Identification of critical success factors (CSFs) allows one to reduce the vast number of factors to some manageable few but vital ones. Based on the CSFs, contractors' limited resources such as money and manpower can be allocated and aligned appropriately for yielding a maximum outcome of overall competitiveness. This paper describes the CSFs identified from a survey study carried out in Mainland China. The ranking analysis of the survey results shows that 35 factors are rated as critical for determining the competitiveness of a contractor. Factor analysis reveals that the 35 CSFs identified can be grouped into eight clusters, namely, project management skills, organization structure, resources, competitive strategy, relationships, bidding, marketing, and technology. The CSFs in this study provide a vehicle for guiding a contractor in managing its resources in order to improve competitive advantage. The study also provides insights into the management of competitiveness for contractors that are operating in the particular context of the Chinese construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: China; competition; construction companies; contractors
Index terms: construction company, survey, competition, critical success factor, China, competitive strategy, bidding, competitive advantage, competitiveness, marketing, factor analysis, construction industry, project management
Subjects: data collection methods, business, organization, control systems, bidding, economic analysis, Geography, project management theory and practice, market analysis, industry analysis, statistical analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here