Heterogeneous approach to modeling contractors' decision-to-bid strategies

Oo, B L; Drew, D S and Lo, H P (2008) Heterogeneous approach to modeling contractors' decision-to-bid strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(10), pp. 766-775. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This research is based on the premise that there is heterogeneity in the population of contractors, i.e., that individual contractors exhibit different bidding behavior when confronted with a given set of bidding variables. Random-coefficients logistic model is used to explicitly measure the heterogeneity across contractors in terms of their (1) intrinsic bid/no-bid preferences and (2) responses to four bidding variables, i.e., number of bidders, market conditions, project type, and size. The binary bid/no-bid decisions were assumed to arise from a logistic model, but with the model parameters that varied between contractors. Data were gathered using a bidding experiment involving Hong Kong and Singapore contractors. The results show that there is significant heterogeneity across the contractors in which Hong Kong contractors can be clustered into four groups of identical (statistical) behavior in response to the four bidding variables, whereas in Singapore, there are only three groups as determined by the underlying heterogeneity distribution. This probabilistic classification of contractors has implications for contractors' competitive strategies by targeting different groups of competitors toward maximum competitiveness.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bids; contractors; Hong Kong; models; Singapore
Index terms: preference, competitive strategy, bidding, bid/no-bid, population, strategy, market condition, experiment, number of bidders, modelling, competitiveness, Singapore, Hong Kong
Subjects: market analysis, demography, Geography, decision-making and reasoning, management, economic analysis, analytical methods, bidding, economic and policy analysis, data collection methods
Topics: Procurement, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here