Seo, J W and Choi, H H (2008) Risk-based safety impact assessment methodology for underground construction projects in Korea. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(1), pp. 72-81. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Safety of construction projects may be affected by various factors such as types and scale of projects, construction methods, safety management procedure, climate, site conditions, etc. Among them is the quality of design in relation to safety. Presently, however, designers typically are not involved in construction safety. They are often uncertain of their responsibilities in relation to construction safety and fail to be responsible for avoiding or reducing safety-related risks. In this study, the concept of safety impact assessment to achieve "design-for-safety" in the design phase is introduced. For this purpose, a safety impact assessment model was devised, and a methodology using the risk-based safety impact assessment approach for open-cut type underground construction projects in Korea is suggested. The suggested methodology includes a safety information survey, classification of safety impact factors caused by design and construction, and quantitative estimation of magnitude and frequency of safety impact factors. A checklist which can be easily used for assessing the safety performance of design products is also proposed. A real-world case study on the safety impact assessment of a subway construction project in Korea is also provided in the paper.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessments; Korea; risk management; safety; underground construction |
| Index terms: | risk management, design and construction, design phase, underground construction, case study, estimation, designer, impact assessment, construction project, methodology, safety performance, construction safety, safety management, survey, construction method |
| Subjects: | production management, research methods, environmental health, geotechnical engineering, building construction, occupational health and safety management, value management, profession, risk assessment, data collection methods, financial and cost management, contractual arrangements, professional practice |
| Topics: | Site Management, Design Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Procurement, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here