Measuring and modeling labor productivity using historical data

Song, L and Abourizk, S M (2008) Measuring and modeling labor productivity using historical data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(10), pp. 786-794. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Labor productivity is a fundamental piece of information for estimating and scheduling a construction project. The current practice of labor productivity estimation relies primarily on either published productivity data or an individual's experience. There is a lack of a systematic approach to measuring and estimating labor productivity. Although historical project data hold important predictive productivity information, the lack of a consistent productivity measurement system and the low quality of historical data may prevent a meaningful analysis of labor productivity. In response to these problems, this paper presents an approach to measuring productivity, collecting historical data, and developing productivity models using historical data. This methodology is applied to model steel drafting and fabrication productivities. First, a consistent labor productivity measurement system was defined for steel drafting and shop fabrication activities. Second, a data acquisition system was developed to collect labor productivity data from past and current projects. Finally, the collected productivity data were used to develop labor productivity models using such techniques as artificial neural network and discrete-event simulation. These productivity models were developed and validated using actual data collected from a steel fabrication company.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; data collection; measurement; neural networks; productivity; simulation
Index terms: productivity, estimation, modelling, fabrication, drafting, labour productivity, project data, neural network, artificial neural network, data acquisition system, scheduling, estimating, construction project, methodology
Subjects: data management, production management, manufacturing engineering, management, research methods, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, analytical methods, modelling and simulation, technical documentation, operations research, data collection methods
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Site Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here