Airborne laser terrain mapping for expediting highway projects: Evaluation of accuracy and cost

Uddin, W (2008) Airborne laser terrain mapping for expediting highway projects: Evaluation of accuracy and cost. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(6), pp. 411-420. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

A typical highway project generally takes 5 years or more from planning phase to construction stage, particularly in wooded and difficult terrain using traditional topographic terrain mapping methods. This paper presents an application of airborne laser terrain mapping technology for a 9 km (5.9 mi.) long highway project in a difficult densely wooded terrain with steep slopes and ravines. Elevation data accuracy, efficiency, and cost effectiveness were compared with the traditional aerial photogrammetry and ground based total station survey methods. The elevations of centerline and 15 different cross sections were compared with groundtruthing data from the total station survey. Using appropriate flight mission parameters, the airborne laser technology permits elevation accuracy of 0.13 m (5 in). There are less operating constraints which adversely affect the productivity of traditional methods, such as cloud and vegetation cover, time of day, and intrusion into private properties. It is recommended to combine the low-altitude airborne laser technology with centerline staking by total station survey and aerial photography. The recommended combined approach saves 33% of the budget and 35% of time.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: alignment; highways; remote sensing; terrain mapping; topographic surveys
Index terms: highway construction, private property, productivity, remote sensing, cost-effectivenes, efficiency, survey, accuracy, slope, mapping
Subjects: research products and data, geotechnical engineering, data collection methods, economics, civil engineering, professional development, management, performance management, real estate economics, spatial and geospatial analysis
Topics: Quality Management, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here