Using scanning lasers to determine the thickness of concrete pavement

Walters, R; Jaselskis, E; Zhang, J; Mueller, K and Kaewmoracharoen, M (2008) Using scanning lasers to determine the thickness of concrete pavement. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(8), pp. 583-591. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Due to limited budgets and reduced inspection staff, state departments of transportation are in need of innovative approaches for providing more efficient quality assurance on concrete paving projects. In Iowa, the current technique is to take core samples of the pavement, which is a labor intensive, destructive process. Due to these limitations, a limited number of cores are used to estimate the pavement thickness. Any method that can reduce or eliminate cores and increase the statistical accuracy of the thickness estimate will be beneficial. One method, which uses a laser to scan the surface of the base prior to paving and then to scan the surface after paving can determine the thickness at any point. Also, scanning lasers provide thorough data coverage that can be used to calculate thickness variance accurately and identify any areas where the thickness is below tolerance. The laser scanning methodology for this study involved the following: (1) investigating characteristics of the paving process; (2) using a laser scanner on three different sites; (3) processing the data to create clean surface models; (4) performing statistical analyses to determine thickness variability; and (5) summarizing the results.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concrete pavements; lasers; nondestructive tests; process control; quality control; thickness
Index terms: estimate, quality control, variability, statistical analysis, inspection, variance, methodology, process control, laser scanning, accuracy, quality assurance, thickness, paving
Subjects: transportation engineering, quality assurance, statistical analysis, measurement and scaling, professional development, research methods, data science, financial and cost management, project delivery, analytical methods, materials science, control systems
Topics: Quality Management, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here