Yu, A T W; Shen, Q; Kelly, J and Hunter, K (2008) Comparative study of the variables in construction project briefing/architectural programming. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(2), pp. 122-138. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Briefing is the process by which client requirements are identified, clarified, and articulated in the early design stage of construction projects. It is crucial to the successful delivery of construction projects. Considerable research has been conducted in briefing during the past two decades. However, researchers consider many current briefing practices to be inadequate, and little research has been done in sufficient depth to explore briefing variables in the construction industry. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework of the variables that have an impact on construction project briefing. A questionnaire survey was conducted to validate these variables among project managers and architects in Hong Kong, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The results indicate that although no significant differences existed between the samples in the United Kingdom and the United States on the variables for construction project briefing, the views of the samples in Hong Kong deviated from the two Western countries. The Western professionals have more positive answers to most statements in the questionnaire. The findings have significant implications for industry practitioners in producing their guidelines for the briefing process and for writers in drafting how-to briefing guide for construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture; best management practice; comparative studies; project management |
| Index terms: | client requirements, architect, drafting, comparative study, project management, early design stage, construction industry, project manager, Hong Kong, questionnaire, programming, practitioner, construction project, management practice, briefing, United States, survey, United Kingdom |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, design process, professional development, Geography, production management, management, industry analysis, scope management, practitioner, programming, research design and methodology, profession, data collection methods, technical documentation |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here