Identifying and assessing influence factors on improving waste management performance for building construction projects

Cha, H S; Kim, J and Han, J Y (2009) Identifying and assessing influence factors on improving waste management performance for building construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), pp. 647-656. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Environmental sustainability has become one of the key drivers for continuous growth in the construction industry. Many project practitioners face challenging circumstances in finding an effective way to prevent pollution and minimize wastes by making the best use of the increasingly scarce natural resources. However, most of these efforts are focused on planning and/or design strategies; therefore, they fail to thoroughly cover the environmental issues based on the construction execution level. Further, there is a lack of quantitative measurement system and management-level guidance. To overcome these limitations, this paper proposes a new methodology that assists project managers to assess the performance level of a project in terms of waste management practice. This study is based on a two-pronged approach. One is the identification of the waste management influence factors that play an important role in decreasing waste and increasing recycled materials on construction sites. The other is the development of an assessment tool to measure the level of waste management performance for a particular project. As a result of this work, 59 factors were identified and an assessment tool was developed based on quantification of these factors. The tool has been proved to effectively measure waste management performance throughout four real-case validity tests. From the industry perspective, this paper contributes to establishing the environmentally sustainable production systems by providing the project stakeholders with an established set of influence factors and with a diagnosis tool for measuring their current performance. Additionally, project owners can use the output of the tool, especially the total index score, as a measure to benchmark the level of waste management for continuous improvement.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessments; environmental issues; sustainable development; waste management
Index terms: environmental sustainability, project stakeholder, practitioner, waste management, methodology, sustainable development, building construction, face, construction site, production system, design strategy, environmental issue, construction industry, recycled materials, validity, natural resource, continuous improvement, owner, project manager, pollution, quantification
Subjects: profession, evaluation and assessment methods, environmental issues, waste management, design methods, practitioner, psychology, environmental resource management, work location, performance measurement, manufacturing engineering, research methods, health safety and environment, measurement and scaling, sociology, building construction, industry analysis, environmental health
Topics: Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Design Practice, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here