Chen, H L (2009) Model for predicting financial performance of development and construction corporations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), pp. 1190-1200. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Performance forecasting is central to aligning an organization's operations with its strategic direction. Despite the panoply of approaches to performance predictions, relatively few published studies address model development of financial performance predictions for the construction industry. By analyzing the preceding relationship between financial and economic variables and financial performance, this paper proposes an innovative approach to predicting firm financial performance. First, hypothesis tests using data for 42 development and construction corporations listed in the construction sector of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1997 Q1 and 2006 Q4 uncover useful relationships between financial performance and financial and economic variables. Second, based on these relationships, a three-stage mathematical modeling procedure is used for cross-sectional model estimation, which is subsequently refined to create firm-specific financial performance-forecasting models for four sample firms. The out-of-sample forecasting accuracy is evaluated using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The results show that the cross-sectional model explains 78.9% of the variation in the cross-sectional performance data, and the MAPE values in the forecasting models range from 9.54 to 19.69%.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction companies; financial factors; forecasting; models; time series analysis |
| Index terms: | model development, construction sector, variation, financial performance, construction company, accuracy, Taiwan, construction industry, mathematical modelling, financial factor, performance prediction, estimation, time-series analysis, forecasting |
| Subjects: | research evaluation and metrics, industry analysis, business analysis, performance management, Geography, contractual condition, professional development, financial and cost management, analytical methods, economic analysis, prediction and forecasting, organization |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here