Dai, J; Goodrum, P M and Maloney, W F (2009) Construction craft workers' perceptions of the factors affecting their productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(3), pp. 217-226. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In efforts to quantify craft workers' perspective of construction productivity, a nationwide survey involving 1,996 craft workers was employed. The survey quantified the relative impact of 83 productivity factors, which had been identified through a series of focus group sessions involving craft workers conducted on construction jobsites located throughout the United States. The findings show that craft workers do have a good understanding of the factors affecting their daily productivity, and most of the adversarial factors affecting productivity can be addressed by site management teams. Factors involving tools and consumables, materials, engineering drawing management and construction equipment were identified as having the greatest impact on productivity from the craft workers' perspective. A statistical comparative analysis was employed to distinguish the significant factors encountered by craft workers on projects with relatively low perceived productivity. The research further examined the differences in the perceived relative magnitude of productivity factors' influence on construction productivity based on respondents' union status and trade. These findings will be beneficial for engaging craft workers in productivity improvement and improving the efficiency of construction jobsites.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; construction sites; labor; productivity; statistics |
| Index terms: | productivity, efficiency, construction equipment, construction productivity, statistics, site management, drawing, construction site, survey, comparative analysis, United States, focus group |
| Subjects: | management, performance management, Geography, construction equipment, technical documentation, work location, operations management, data analysis and analytics, construction operations, data collection methods, mathematical modelling |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Business Strategy, Plant and Equipment, Quality Management, Design Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here