Contractors' claims insurance: A risk retention approach

El-Adaway, I H and Kandil, A A (2009) Contractors' claims insurance: A risk retention approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(9), pp. 819-825. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The negative effects of claims and disputes have serious negative impacts on contracting parties, their projects, the construction industry as a whole, and consequently on the nation's economy. This paper explores a method for mitigating the negative effects associated with contractors' claims and disputes using a risk retention approach. This method can help contractors in getting early relief from the financial and economic burdens of construction claims. To meet the goals and objectives of this study, the writers have: (1) investigated the feasibility of pricing insurance premiums using the options pricing theory; (2) explored the applicability of modeling the options pricing theory using Monte Carlo simulation; (3) set up the principles required for optimal design of a risk retention group for construction claims; and (4) tested the possible impact of the newly developed risk retention group using historic data of 10,193 construction projects spanning over 12 different California districts. Pursuant to this study, it was verified that construction claims satisfy the required principles for insurance. Also, based on the used testing framework, the developed risk retention group for construction claims has been proved a success from the insured and insurer sides. It is the writers' hope that this study will lay the basis for a leading risk management technique that could be extended over the nation for the benefit of relieving the negative consequences associated with lengthy claims and disputes resolution in the construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: claims; contracts; financing; risk management
Index terms: construction claim, financing, construction project, risk retention, dispute, Monte Carlo simulation, contracting party, pricing, resolution, testing, construction industry, modelling, option, insurance, risk management
Subjects: industry analysis, decision analysis, payment, conflict resolution, financial risk, production management, analytical methods, economic analysis, professional practice, modelling and simulation, practitioner, dispute resolution, risk assessment
Topics: Contract Administration, Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here