Fong, P S W and Kwok, C W C (2009) Organizational culture and knowledge management success at project and organizational levels in contracting firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(12), pp. 1348-1356. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This research focuses on contracting firms within the construction sector. It characterizes and evaluates the composition of organizational culture using four culture types (clan, adhocracy, market, and hierarchy), the strategic approach for knowledge flow, and the success of knowledge management (KM) systems at different hierarchical levels of contracting organizations (project and parent organization level). Responses from managers of local or overseas contracting firms operating in Hong Kong were collected using a carefully constructed questionnaire survey that was distributed through electronic mail. The organizational value is analyzed in terms of the four cultural models. Clan culture is found to be the most popular at both project and organization levels, which means that the culture of contracting firms very much depends on honest communication, respect for people, trust, and cohesive relationships. On the other hand, hierarchy culture, which focuses on stability and continuity, and analysis and control, seems to be the least favored at both levels. Another significant finding was that the two main KM strategies for knowledge flow, codification and personalization, were employed at both project and organization levels in equal proportion. This indicates that successful KM efforts at both enterprise levels utilize a hybrid and balanced approach for their knowledge flow, and that they complement each other. The findings also revealed that knowledge management system success factors emphasize the support of the management level. The results show that KM is critical and beneficial as indicated by 64% at the project and 74% at the organization level. The expectation is higher for organizations as they are the organizational memories in which experiences of past projects are archived and connected. Understanding these factors and the relationships among them has been demonstrated to be critical in order to increase the chances of success or to help with making decisions when applying KM.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction companies; contractors; decision making; knowledge-based systems; organizations |
| Index terms: | decision-making, respect for people, questionnaire, contracting organization, construction sector, knowledge management, organizational culture, knowledge flow, organizational value, manager, stability, strategy, success factor, construction company, survey, organizational memory, knowledge management system, Hong Kong, knowledge-based system, culture type |
| Subjects: | cross-cultural studies, decision analysis, sociology, information systems, industry analysis, management, structural engineering, professional development, Geography, health monitoring assessment and metrics, ethical practice, artificial intelligence, knowledge management, business, organization, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | International Construction, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here