Contemporary design-bid-build model

Hallowell, M and Toole, T M (2009) Contemporary design-bid-build model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(6), pp. 540-549. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Empirical research was performed into the hypothesis that a substantial number of building performance engineering tasks on design-bid-build projects are typically provided by entities associated with the construction phase, not with the architect-engineer (AE) of record. This hypothesis is contrary to the traditional understanding of design-bid-build and is theorized to result from increased time pressures on AEs, decreased AE profit margins, AEs' attempts to minimize liability, increased design and construction specialization, and increased prefabrication. Project technical specifications were analyzed for 20 $5-45M building construction projects and 16 individuals directly associated with these projects were interviewed. It was found that 35 building performance engineering tasks were required by the project specifications to be performed by entities associated with the construction of the buildings. This large number of delegated design tasks suggests the conventional understanding of the design-bid-build process is not accurate. The increasing fragmentation of the design and construction process may have implications for the efficiency of communication on design-bid-build projects, lean construction processes, and constructability.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bids; building design; project delivery
Index terms: engineer, efficiency, design and construction, prefabrication, building performance, design-bid-build, lean construction, constructability, fragmentation, building design, liability, architect, specification, project delivery, construction phase, specialization, building construction, profit
Subjects: contractual condition, business, performance management, profession, quality assurance, architectural design, construction integration, building construction, contractual arrangements, project delivery, liability law, economic analysis
Topics: Quality Management, Organizational Design, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Project Management, Site Management, Roles and Professions, Contract Administration, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here