Empirical analysis of the learning curve principle in prestressed concrete piles

Hinze, J and Olbina, S (2009) Empirical analysis of the learning curve principle in prestressed concrete piles. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(5), pp. 425-431. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The principle of learning curves can be applied in construction for the prediction of the time/cycle of future work, work performance levels, and other performance measures. Learning curve principles can be effectively utilized in litigation cases where production is compromised by delays. The objective of this study was to determine if learning curves could be used to accurately predict the production efforts of future units by applying the principles to the prefabrication and driving of prestressed concrete piles. The individual time to cast each of the concrete piles was recorded and used to compute the cumulative average time (CATN) to fabricate the concrete piles. The data were used to compute the learning rate (φ) and the theoretical time to complete the first unit (Kc). From this information, predictions were made as to the amount of effort to fabricate future piles. The results showed that the pile fabrication crew improved its learning throughout the pile fabrication effort, but this improvement was quite small. The learning curve theory was found to apply well to large numbers of repeated items, and that the predictions made with learning curves are reasonably accurate.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: empirical equations; piles; prefabrication; prestressed concrete
Index terms: performance measure, work performance, prefabrication, litigation, fabrication
Subjects: building construction, operations management, manufacturing engineering, dispute resolution, performance measurement
Topics: Construction Technology, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here