Fuzzy intellectual capital index for construction firms

Kale, S (2009) Fuzzy intellectual capital index for construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(6), pp. 508-517. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction firms are now operating in a new era. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage in this era primarily depends on effective and efficient management of knowledge assets. This paper proposes a performance evaluation model called fuzzy intellectual capital index (FICI) that can guide construction business executives to effectively and efficiently manage their knowledge assets. FICI incorporates an intellectual capital performance measurement model with fuzzy set theory to adequately handle imprecision, vagueness, and uncertainty that prevail in this process. FICI uses the fuzzy-weighted average algorithm to compute the intellectual capital performance of architectural/engineering/construction (A/E/C) firms. It is an internal reporting model that can guide executives of A/E/C firms to evaluate their firm's ability to achieve their strategic objectives and to pinpoint their firm's strengths and weaknesses in order to neutralize threats and to exploit opportunities presented by today's construction business environment. A real-world case study is presented to illustrate the implementation and utility of the proposed model. Implications for practitioners and directions for future research are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction companies; fuzzy sets; information management; knowledge-based systems; performance characteristics
Index terms: practitioner, construction firm, fuzzy set theory, construction company, case study, implementation, fuzzy set, performance evaluation, knowledge-based system, executive, competitive advantage, performance measurement
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, organization, market analysis, contractual arrangements, performance measurement, artificial intelligence, decision-making and optimization
Topics: Research Practice, Quality Management, Procurement, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here