Probabilistic duration estimation model for high-rise structural work

Lee, H S; Shin, J W; Park, M and Ryu, H G (2009) Probabilistic duration estimation model for high-rise structural work. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(12), pp. 1289-1298. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The duration of a construction project is a key factor to consider before starting a new project, as it can determine project success or failure. Despite the high level of uncertainty and risk involved in construction, current construction planning relies on traditional deterministic scheduling methods that cannot clearly ascertain the level of uncertainty involved in a project. This, subsequently, can prolong a project's duration, particularly when that project is high-rise structural work, which is not yet a common project type in Korea. Indeed, among construction processes, structural work is notable, as it is basically performed outdoors. Thus, no matter how precisely a schedule is developed, such projects can easily fail due to unexpected events that are beyond the planner's control, such as changes in weather conditions. Therefore, in this study, to cope with the uncertainties involved in high-rise building projects, a probabilistic duration estimation model is developed in which both weather conditions and work cycle time for unit work are considered to predict structural work duration. According to the proposed estimation model, weather variables are divided into two types: weather conditions that result in nonworking days and weather conditions that result in work productivity rate (WPR) change. Obtained from actual previous data, the WPR is used with relevant nonworking day weather conditions to modify the actual number of working days per calendar days. Furthermore, on the basis of previous research results, the cycle time of the unit work area is assumed to follow the Β probability distribution function. Thus, the probabilistic duration model is valid for 95% probability. Finally, a case study is conducted that confirms the model can be practically used to estimate more reliable and applicable probabilistic durations of structural work. Indeed, this model can assist schedulers and site workers by alerting them, at the beginning of a project, to project uncertainties that specifically pertain to structural work and the weather. Thus, the proposed model can enable personnel to easily amend, and increase the reliability of, the construction schedule at hand.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; high-rise; forecasting; probability; productivity; simulation; weather conditions
Index terms: estimate, duration, construction planning, planner, productivity, estimation, probability distribution, forecasting, project success, case study, high-rise building, weather, construction project, construction process, personnel, scheduler, project uncertainty, scheduling
Subjects: practitioner, air quality, profession, construction type, data collection methods, prediction and forecasting, construction planning, financial and cost management, operations research, project management theory and practice, production management, management, statistical analysis, building construction, project controls
Topics: Human Resources, Site Management, Time Control, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here