Ling, F Y Y; Pham, V M C and Hoang, T P (2009) Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for architectural, engineering, and construction firms: Case study of Vietnam. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(10), pp. 1105-1113. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
After Vietnam became a member of the World Trade Organization, Vietnamese architectural, engineering, and construction (A/E/C) firms face competition from not only their domestic competitors but also from foreign A/E/C firms. As most Vietnamese firms are used to operating under a protected setting, they may face difficulties competing in the globalized environment. This study undertakes a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of Vietnamese A/E/C firms, investigates how they respond to opportunities and threats, and recommends how foreign A/E/C firms operating in Vietnam could respond. Using semistructured interview questions, face-to-face interviews were conducted with Vietnamese and foreign A/E/C firms. The SWOT analysis reveals that Vietnamese A/E/C firms are lagging behind foreign firms in financial capacity, experience in complex projects, knowledge in advanced design and construction technology, and management ability. Industry practitioners from outside Vietnam who are contemplating entering the Vietnamese market can leverage on Vietnamese firms' strengths by forming joint ventures with strong and reputable private Vietnamese firms. To improve their competitive advantage, it is recommended that foreign A/E/C firms offer superior products and services and familiarize themselves with local culture and regulations. They should be mindful of corruption and set up surveillance systems to curb wasteful spending.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | agriculture; case reports; construction companies; economic factors; engineering firms; international factors; Vietnam |
| Index terms: | competitive advantage, corruption, Vietnam, face, interview, competition, joint venture, foreign firm, World Trade Organization, design and construction, surveillance, regulation, case study, economic factor, construction firm, construction company, practitioner, engineering firm, complex project |
| Subjects: | business, economic concepts, psychology, contractual arrangements, monitoring and control systems, political science, firms, institutional frameworks, strategic project management, strategic management, market analysis, organization, data collection methods, Geography, professional ethics, practitioner |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Project Management, Geographical Context, Governance, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Research Practice, International Construction, Business Strategy, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here