Mao, X; Zhang, X and Abourizk, S M (2009) Enhancing value engineering process by incorporating inventive problem-solving techniques. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(5), pp. 416-424. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The creativity phase is critical to the success of a value engineering exercise, in which the brainstorming technique is deployed to generate ideas. One shortcoming of the brainstorming technique is its lack of direction in problem solving, and consequently the efficiency is low in generating innovative and useful ideas. To overcome this shortcoming, this paper has explored the possibility of incorporating the theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) into the workshop session of the value engineering exercise by initiating three new procedures in this session: (1) an initial design procedure to examine the functions of a proposed project; (2) a function trimming procedure to fully utilize existing resources and ensure low life-cycle cost and sustainability of the proposed project; and (3) an interaction analysis procedure to assess the proposed project in a broad perspective with social, economic, and environmental awareness. A case study has indicated the workability of the modified workshop procedures and the usefulness of TRIZ tools and techniques in efficiently and effectively creating innovative ideas.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; problem solving; value engineering |
| Index terms: | value engineering, TRIZ, workability, problem solving, efficiency, creativity, exercise, workshop, case study, interaction, environmental awareness |
| Subjects: | health behaviours and lifestyles, design methods, value management, problem-solving, construction type, data collection methods, environmental behaviour, performance management, decision-making and reasoning, innovation and creative processes, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here