Cognitive approach to construction safety: Task demand-capability model

Mitropoulos, P; Cupido, G and Namboodiri, M (2009) Cognitive approach to construction safety: Task demand-capability model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(9), pp. 881-889. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In the evolution of safety research, the literature identifies three paradigms: Normative, error-based, and cognitive engineering. Traditionally, strategies to improve construction safety have been based on the normative paradigm-compliance with prescribed safety rules. However, the normative approach ignores how the characteristics of the production system and team processes influence the work behaviors and the possibility of errors and accidents. These factors are the focus of the cognitive engineering perspective. This study develops a cognitive model of construction safety, which conceptualizes safety as an emergent property of the production system. The model proposes that during a task, the task demands and the applied capabilities determine the potential for errors and accidents. It also proposes that the production practices and the teamwork processes of the crew shape the work situations that the workers face-that is, the task demands and the applied capability. Empirical evidence from recent case studies is discussed. The cognitive perspective shifts the focus of accident prevention from conformance with rules to the issues of task demands and applied capabilities, and the factors affecting them-such as work design, workload, resource allocation, and team processes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: accident prevention; occupational safety; production management; teamwork
Index terms: safety research, production management, compliance, evolution, production system, paradigm, case study, strategy, construction safety, face, resource allocation, workload, occupational safety, teamwork, accident prevention, evidence
Subjects: environmental health, education and knowledge transfer, evaluation and assessment methods, resource management, environmental science, health safety and environment, project delivery, management, manufacturing engineering, data collection methods, psychology, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Health and Safety, Project Management, Human Resources, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here