Sawhney, A; Walsh, K D; Bashford, H H and Palaniappan, S (2009) Impact of inspected buffers on production parameters of construction processes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(4), pp. 319-329. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper examines the production implications of quality control inspections conducted on the buffer between processes in a construction project by modeling the linkage between these processes. Inspection of partially completed work at the end of one activity but before the beginning of work by the next activity is fairly common. Work that is deemed to be of sufficient quality is then made available for the next activity. Work that is deemed insufficient requires rework, typically by the trade appropriate to the activity that fed into the buffer, to bring the work into compliance. This has implications for workload management for that trade, of course, as well as for the reliability of work flow to the successor or downstream processes. While such situations are common in all construction sectors, an example from the residential construction sector was examined via a simulation model augmented by field data collected from residential construction projects. The impacts of the work flow into the predecessor process, the inspection pass rate, and resource availability were examined. The inspection pass rate was found to dramatically affect the reliability of work flow, unless resources are unlimited. Furthermore, the inspection pass rate was found to be functionally related to the production parameters of the process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; residential; inspection; production management; productivity; project management; resource management; simulation models |
| Index terms: | successor, residential construction, buffer, quality control, modelling, project management, resource management, linkage, productivity, inspection, construction project, construction process, construction sector, compliance, production management, rework, workload |
| Subjects: | business, control systems, operations management, operations research, analytical methods, project delivery, construction integration, management, project management theory and practice, financial risk, production management, health safety and environment, building construction, quality assurance, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Human Resources, Quality Management, Site Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here