Shapira, A and Simcha, M (2009) Measurement and risk scales of crane-related safety factors on construction sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(10), pp. 979-989. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper addresses quantitative measurement and risk scales of safety hazards on construction sites due to the work of tower cranes. Hazard measurement and risk scales are essential components of an integrated model aimed at quantitatively determining the safety level of individual construction sites, on a comparative basis. The paper focuses on two factors identified in earlier studies as considerably affecting safety on sites with tower cranes, "overlapping cranes" and "operator proficiency." These two factors are inherently different from each other in their characteristics and therefore also in the methods used to measure both the factors and the risk resulting from them. A probability-based method was prescribed for the measurement of overlapping cranes, while the analytical hierarchy process method and knowledge elicitation from experts were applied to develop metrics for operator proficiency. In both cases, an intimate understanding of the crane work environment is necessary. The uniform format and specific methodologies presented here can be used in the development of measurement techniques and risk scales for other safety factors concerning crane operation on construction sites.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction sites; cranes; hazards; quantitative analysis; safety factors |
| Index terms: | analytical hierarchy process, work environment, tower crane, integrated model, quantitative analysis, methodology, safety factor, construction site |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, data analysis and analytics, work location, financial risk, research methods, maintenance engineering, management, decision-making and optimization |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here