Wan, S K M; Kumaraswamy, M M and Liu, D T C (2009) Contributors to construction debris from electrical and mechanical work in Hong Kong infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), pp. 637-646. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The crucial problem of construction debris is of increasing concern in Hong Kong. In the construction industry, the electrical and mechanical (E&M) installations in the infrastructure, for example, buildings, tunnels, or dams, are some of the major and usually complex components. Difficulty in coordinating the various trades affects productivity in general, and has a major impact on the quantity of construction debris. By identifying the sources of waste at each stage of E&M engineering work, some of the construction debris can be eliminated at the source during production. This paper investigates the critical production shortcomings in the E&M sector in Hong Kong. The study is based on a survey that includes a preliminary questionnaire survey, brainstorming exercises with a focus group, structured interviews with experienced frontline supervisors, and a second focus group exercise to test findings and proposed measures. The principal findings are that "poor coordination" and "design changes and/or errors" are major contributors to variations or change orders and rework, which in turn result in a high volume of construction debris. The results also indicate that construction debris can be minimized in the E&M sector of the construction industry, if the material wastes from incidental work are reduced and also controlled better in a new work process flow pattern through recommended construction project management improvements for reducing critical production shortcomings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; debris; Hong Kong; waste management |
| Index terms: | design change, rework, survey, interview, tunnel, focus group, variation, waste management, questionnaire, productivity, change order, Hong Kong, exercise, construction industry, supervisor, infrastructure project, coordination, construction project management |
| Subjects: | waste management, health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, operations management, contractual condition, Geography, project management theory and practice, management, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Procurement, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here