Watkins, M; Mukherjee, A; Onder, N and Mattila, K (2009) Using agent-based modeling to study construction labor productivity as an emergent property of individual and crew interactions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), pp. 657-667. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Lean construction research has shown that managing work flow effectively and maintaining labor flow on site can improve construction labor performance. Related research also shows that congestion on construction sites often leads to lowered efficiency. Using these findings as a point of departure, we use the agent-based modeling method to represent the construction site as a system of complex interactions and explore whether labor efficiency can be treated as an emergent property resulting from individual and crew interactions in space. This allows us to use a "bottom-up" approach to analyzing labor efficiency, which supplements existing "top-down" approaches to modeling the impacts of space congestion on labor efficiency. A pilot implementation of the agent-based model, and preliminary results illustrating the relationships between congestion and labor efficiency are presented. The empirical studies exhibit system behavior that support published principles of work-force management. The primary contribution of this paper is that it provides a method that can be used to efficiently utilize construction space, and develop plans and schedules that account for congestion arising from crew interactions in space.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; labor; lean construction; productivity; workspace |
| Index terms: | modelling, interaction, implementation, construction labour, empirical study, workspace, agent-based modelling, productivity, efficiency, agent, construction site, lean construction |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, building construction, research methods, performance management, management, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, work location, modelling and simulation, practitioner |
| Topics: | Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Site Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here