Estimating work zone road user cost for alternative contracting methods in highway construction projects

Zhu, Y; Ahmad, I and Wang, L (2009) Estimating work zone road user cost for alternative contracting methods in highway construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), pp. 601-608. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Highway construction often causes an additional road user cost (RUC) to motorists due to traffic flow interruption and congestion in work zones. Consequently, facility owners, such as the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), are often interested in using alternative contracting methods such as A+B contracting to expedite construction. Although many of these contracting methods rely on the RUC to determine incentives or disincentives, no standard method for RUC calculation is available to FDOT district engineers. In addition, existing methods are neither practical nor user-friendly for determining incentives or disincentives. This study intends to develop a RUC calculation procedure for the FDOT that focuses on using data that are easily accessible to FDOT district engineers, such as drawings and maintenance of traffic plans. The procedure is developed based on traffic analysis methods published in the Highway Capacity Manual, previous studies on user benefit analysis and work zones, and empirical data specific to Florida. Case studies are used to illustrate the procedure and to compare it with two other existing models, the Arizona model and the queue and user cost evaluation of work zone model, through correlation analysis, comparison of calculation assumptions, and data input analysis. This study shows that the suggested procedure produces consistent RUC estimates.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contracts; Florida; highway and road construction; traffic congestion; workspace
Index terms: road construction, traffic flow, highway construction, estimate, case study, traffic congestion, correlation analysis, engineer, owner, workspace, contracting method, estimating, calculation procedure, drawing
Subjects: sociology, measurement and scaling, transportation engineering, statistical analysis, management, civil engineering, technical documentation, contractual arrangements, financial and cost management, data collection methods, profession
Topics: Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here